Radiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer aged 80 years or older: A 16-year experience.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in esophageal cancer (EC) patients aged ≥80 years. However, the survival modality and prognostic factors remain poorly understood. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the tolerance and long-term overall survival (OS) of patients aged ≥80 years who were diagnosed with EC and underwent definitive RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 213 consecutive patients with EC over 80 years old who were treated with curative intent RT between February 1999 and December 2015 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical prognostic variables were analyzed against OS in univariate analyses using log-rank tests and in a multivariate model using Cox regression proportional hazards analysis. RESULT: The median patient age was 82 (range: 80-94) years. Atotal of 192 patients (90.1%) completed the definitive RT (median: 60 Gy, range: 50-72 Gy), and 11 patients had grade 4 or higher acute toxicity, including esophagitis, a cardiac event, infections, and sudden death. Atotal of 168 deaths (78.9%) were observed with a median follow up of 47 months (range: 0-153 months). The OS rates were 50.3%, 17.6%, and 13.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified that tumors located in the cervical and upper thorax, a shorter tumor lesion, RT treatment of 50-60Gy, and a better response to treatment were the factors associated with longer OS. CONCLUSION: Definitive RT could be considered as an effective treatment for patients with EC who are older than 80 years, and 50-60 Gy seems to be a reasonable dose for these patients.

Radiomics models based on CT at different phases predicting lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (GASTO-1089).

Purpose: To investigate the value of radiomics models based on CT at different phases (non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced images) in predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods and materials: Two hundred and seventy-four eligible patients with ESCC were divided into a training set (n =193) and a validation set (n =81). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm (LASSO) was used to select radiomics features. The predictive models were constructed with radiomics features and clinical factors through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance and clinical application value of the models were evaluated by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Delong Test was used to evaluate the differences in AUC among models. Results: Sixteen and eighteen features were respectively selected from non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images. The model established using only clinical factors (Model 1) has an AUC value of 0.655 (95%CI 0.552-0.759) with a sensitivity of 0.585, a specificity of 0.725 and an accuracy of 0.654. The models contained clinical factors with radiomics features of NECT or/and CECT (Model 2,3,4) have significantly improved prediction performance. The values of AUC of Model 2,3,4 were 0.766, 0.811 and 0.809, respectively. It also achieved a great AUC of 0.800 in the model built with only radiomics features derived from NECT and CECT (Model 5). DCA suggested the potential clinical benefit of model prediction of LN metastasis of ESCC. A comparison of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using the Delong test indicated that Models 2, 3, 4, and 5 were superior to Model 1(P< 0.05), and no difference was found among Model 2, 3, 4 and Model 5(P > 0.05). Conclusion: Radiomics models based on CT at different phases could accurately predict the lymph node metastasis in patients with ESCC, and their predictive efficiency was better than the clinical model based on tumor size criteria. NECT-based radiomics model could be a reasonable option for ESCC patients due to its lower price and availability for renal failure or allergic patients.

Distribution of Peripheral Blood Cells in Esophageal Cancer Patients During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Predicts Long-Term Locoregional Progression Hazard After Treatment (GASTO1072).

PURPOSE: Predicting the response to chemoradiotherapy is critical for the optimal management of esophageal cancer; however, it remains an unmet clinical need. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of peri-treatment peripheral blood cells (PBC) in disease progression hazard in esophageal cancer following chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 87 patients with primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were subjected to definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a Phase II trial. PBC parameters (hemoglobin, neutrophils, platelets, lymphocytes, and monocytes) were collected at seven time points throughout the course of radiotherapy. The potential of peri-treatment PBC parameters to predict the 3-year cumulative hazard of tumor progression was evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with disease progression displayed distinct distribution patterns of peri-treatment PBC compared to that in patients without disease progression. Greater prediction capabilities for risk of locoregional disease progression were found in PBC collected after the start of radiotherapy compared to those in their pretreatment counterparts, and in individual parameters rather than cell-to-cell ratios. The most predictive PBC parameters were integrated by summation and designated as a PBC score (PBCS), which further augmented their predictive power. Patients classified according to their PBCS (high vs medium v. low) had significantly different 3-year cumulative hazards of locoregional progression (58% vs 29% vs 7%, P = 0.0017). Multivariate analysis confirmed that high PBCS (HR, 12.2; 95% CI, 2.0-76.3; P = 0.007) and medium (HR, 5.8; 95% CI 1.2-27.7; P = 0.028) were independent indicators of locoregional progression. CONCLUSION: Systematic analysis of PBC distribution in esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy could help predict long-term locoregional progression hazard after treatment.

Imaging biomarkers of contrast-enhanced computed tomography predict survival in oesophageal cancer after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT)-based imaging biomarkers (IBMs) for the treatment outcomes of patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: Altogether, 154 patients with OSCC who underwent definitive CCRT were included in this retrospective study. All patients were randomised to the training cohort (n = 99) or the validation cohort (n = 55). Pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT scans were obtained for all patients and used for the extraction of IBMs. An IBM score, was constructed by using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with Cox regression analysis, which was equal to the log-partial hazard of the Cox model in the training cohort and tested in the validation cohort. IBM nomograms were built based on IBM scores for individualised survival estimation. Finally, a decision curve analysis was performed to estimate the clinical usefulness of the nomograms. RESULTS: Altogether, 96 IBMs were extracted from each contrast-enhanced CT scan. IBM scores were constructed from 11 CT-based IBMs for overall survival (OS) and 8 IBMs for progression-free survival (PFS), using the LASSO-Cox regression method in the training cohort. Multivariate analysis revealed that IBM score was an independent prognostic factor correlated with OS and PFS. In the training cohort, the C-indices of IBM scores were 0.734 (95% CI 0.664-0.804) and 0.658 (95% CI 0.587-0.729) for OS and PFS, respectively. In the validation cohort, C-indices were 0.672 (95% CI 0.578-0.766) and 0.666 (95% CI 0.574-0.758) for OS and PFS, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significant difference between risk subgroups in the training and validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical usefulness of the IBM score. CONCLUSIONS: The IBM score based on pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT could predict the OS and PFS for patients with OSCC after definitive CCRT. Further multicentre studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Radiobiological evaluation of simultaneously dose-escalated versus non-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with upper thoracic esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiobiological response between simultaneously dose-escalated and non-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DE-IMRT and NE-IMRT) for patients with upper thoracic esophageal cancer (UTEC) using radiobiological evaluation. METHODS: Computed tomography simulation data sets for 25 patients pathologically diagnosed with primary UTEC were used in this study. DE-IMRT plan with an escalated dose of 64.8 Gy/28 fractions to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and involved lymph nodes from 25 patients pathologically diagnosed with primary UTEC, was compared to an NE-IMRT plan of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions. Dose-volume metrics, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability for the lung and spinal cord were compared. In addition, the risk of acute esophageal toxicity (AET) and late esophageal toxicity (LET) were also analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with NE-IMRT plan, we found the DE-IMRT plan resulted in a 14.6 Gy dose escalation to the GTV. The tumor control was predicted to increase by 31.8%, 39.1%, and 40.9% for three independent TCP models. The predicted incidence of radiation pneumonitis was similar (3.9% versus 3.6%), and the estimated risk of radiation-induced spinal cord injury was extremely low (<0.13%) in both groups. Regarding the esophageal toxicities, the estimated grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 AET predicted by the Kwint model were increased by 2.5% and 3.8%. Grade ≥2 AET predicted using the Wijsman model was increased by 14.9%. The predicted incidence of LET was low (<0.51%) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Radiobiological evaluation reveals that the DE-IMRT dosing strategy is feasible for patients with UTEC, with significant gains in tumor control and minor or clinically acceptable increases in radiation-induced toxicities.

Different definitions of esophagus influence esophageal toxicity prediction for esophageal cancer patients administered simultaneous integrated boost versus standard-dose radiation therapy.

We aim to evaluate whether different definitions of esophagus (DEs) impact on the esophageal toxicity prediction for esophageal cancer (EC) patients administered intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) vs. standard-dose IMRT (SD-IMRT). The esophagus for 21 patients diagnosed with primary EC were defined in the following four ways: the whole esophagus, including the tumor (ESOwhole); ESOwhole within the treatment field (ESOinfield); ESOinfield, excluding the tumor (ESOinfield-tumor) and ESOwhole, excluding the tumor (ESOwhole-tumor). The difference in the dose variation, acute esophageal toxicity (AET) and late esophageal toxicity (LET) of four DEs were compared. We found that the mean esophageal dose for ESOwhole, ESOinfield, ESOinfield-tumor and ESOwhole-tumor were increased by 7.2 Gy, 10.9 Gy, 4.6 Gy and 2.0 Gy, respectively, in the SIB-IMRT plans. Radiobiological models indicated that a grade ≥ 2 AET was 2.9%, 3.1%, 2.2% and 1.6% higher on average with the Kwint model and 14.6%, 13.2%, 7.2% and 3.4% higher with the Wijsman model for the four DEs. A grade ≥ 3 AET increased by 4.3%, 7.2%, 4.2% and 1.2%, respectively. Additionally, the predicted LET increased by 0.15%, 0.39%, 1.2 × 10-2% and 1.5 × 10-3%. Our study demonstrates that different DEs influence the esophageal toxicity prediction for EC patients administered SIB-IMRT vs. SD-IMRT treatment.

Radiation dose escalation by simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: a phase II study.

The outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) underwent standard-dose radical radiotherapy were still disappointing. This phase II study investigated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of radiation dose escalation using simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) combined with chemotherapy in 60 EC patients. Radiotherapy consisted of 66Gy at 2.2 Gy/fraction to the gross tumor and 54Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction to subclinical diseases simultaneously. Chemotherapy including cisplatin and 5fluorouracil were administered to all patients during and after radiotherapy. The data showed that the majority of patients (98.3%) completed the whole course of radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. The most common ≥ grade 3 acute toxicities were neutropenia (16.7%), followed by esophagitis (6.7%) and thrombopenia (5.0%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (5-38) for all patients and 30 months (18-38) for those still alive, 11 patients (18.3%) developed ≥ Grade 3 late toxicities and 2 (3.3%) of them died subsequently due to esophageal hemorrhage. The 1- and 2-year local-regional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 87.6% and 78.6%, 86.0% and 80.5%, 75.6% and 64.4%, 86.7% and 72.7%, respectively. SMART combined with concurrent chemotherapy is feasible in EC patients with tolerable acute toxicities. They showed a trend of significant improvements in local-regional control and overall survival. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the late toxicities.

[Long-term efficacy of prophylactic upper neck irradiation for stage N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Whether prophylactic irradiation should cover the whole neck or just the upper neck for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, without neck lymph node metastasis (N0), remains controversial. This study was to assess the rationality of prophylactic upper neck irradiation for stage N0 NPC patients. METHODS: Clinical data of 432 stage N0 NPC patients were analyzed. All patients were treated with radical radiotherapy alone. The extent of prophylactic irradiation was limited to the upper neck of the patients. Median radiation doses were 70 Gy for the primary tumors, and 50 Gy for the upper necks. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival rates and neck recurrence rates. Log-rank test was used to compare neck recurrence rates in patients with or without nasopharyngeal recurrence. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the prognostic factors for neck control. RESULTS: Seventeen out of 432 patients had neck recurrence. The 5-year control rate of the neck was 96.06%. Among the 17 patients with neck recurrence, 6 had concurrent nasopharyngeal relapse. The occurrence rates of neck recurrence alone were 0.93%(4/432) in the upper necks and 1.62% (7/432) in the lower necks (P=0.937). The neck recurrence rates were 9.52% (6/63) and 2.98% (11/369) in patients with and without nasopharyngeal recurrence, respectively (P=0.002). Nasopharyngeal recurrence was the only independent prognostic factor for neck control. CONCLUSION: The overall neck recurrence rate is low for stage N0 NPC patients after receiving irradiation. Prophylactic upper neck irradiation is reasonable for stage N0 NPC patients.